Error 406
T𰁆𰀡𰁶 F𰀁𰅴𰀩IS𰄢
Not Acceptable
Toggle navigation
  • Home
  • News
  • Error 406
  • Error 415
  • Collaborators
  • Essays
  • Exhibition now live
Error 417 Expectation Fail logo

Error 406
T𰁆𰀡𰁶 F𰀁𰅴𰀩IS𰄢
Not Acceptable

In May 2025 we launched our first call for artistic projects: instructions, scores, how-tos, interventions and practices against tech fascism. 13 projects were selected by the jury – Hito Steyerl, Nora O’Murchú, and Sam Lavigne – and presented in the online exhibition 13 Scores Against Tech Fascism.

This call for resistance was about finding ways to challenge the current systems with the means available: misdirection, opting out, and pushing back. Resisting in solidarity with others and carving out spaces in which we can develop technological systems that align with collective needs rather than exploiting us.

Linked Articles

Event date: 16 Jan 2026 Location: online

13 S𰀠𰅃𰅦𰁖𰅴 𰀅𰁩𰀀𰂔N𰅸𰆆 𰆄𰁒𰀡𰁷 𰁡𰀄𰅵𰀥𰂔𰅶M

Online Exhibition now live!

13 S𰀠𰅃𰅦𰁖𰅴 𰀅𰁩𰀀𰂔N𰅸𰆆 𰆄𰁒𰀡𰁷 𰁡𰀄𰅵𰀥𰂔𰅶M

The exhibition presents 13 projects selected by the jury Hito Steyerl, Nora O’ Murchú and Sam Lavigne, through the open call Error 406 [Tech Fascism] Not Acceptable, initiated by Error 417 Expectation Failed in 2025.

More
Event date: 30 Jan–31 Jul 2026 Location: Lothringer 13, Munich

A𰄨𰆅𰂒𰁠𰀀𰅵𰀧𰂐S𰄢: 𰄣𰅅𰈄. x 13 S𰀠𰅃𰅦𰁖𰅴 𰀅𰁩𰀀𰂔N𰅸𰆆 𰆄𰁒𰀡𰁷 𰁡𰀄𰅵𰀥𰂔𰅶M

13 Scores Against Tech Fascism exhibited at Lothringer 13

A𰄨𰆅𰂒𰁠𰀀𰅵𰀧𰂐S𰄢: 𰄣𰅅𰈄. x 13 S𰀠𰅃𰅦𰁖𰅴 𰀅𰁩𰀀𰂔N𰅸𰆆 𰆄𰁒𰀡𰁷 𰁡𰀄𰅵𰀥𰂔𰅶M

Our online exhibition and the 13 Scores Against Tech Fascism is being presented within the exhibition 'Antifascism: Now' at Lothringer 13 in Munich.

More
Published: 11 Jul 2025

Error 406
T𰁆𰀡𰁶 F𰀁𰅴𰀩IS𰄢
Not Acceptable

Selected Projects

Error 406<br>T𰁆𰀡𰁶 F𰀁𰅴𰀩IS𰄢<br>Not Acceptable

13 projects were selected through the open call Error 406 [Tech Fascism] Not Acceptable. The projects explore very immediate, poetic, and humorous forms of resistance, refusal, and subversion that push back against tech fascism.

More
Published: 14 May 2025

R𰁉𰁠𰆒𰅸𰂈𰄱𰁩 𰆄𰁇C𰂀 𰁡𰀁𰅴𰀥𰂆SM

An essay on Refusing Tech Fascism by writer and sociotechnologist Jürgen Geuter aka @tante, commissioned within the call for projects Error 406 [Tech Fascism] Not Acceptable.

R𰁉𰁠𰆒𰅸𰂈𰄱𰁩 𰆄𰁇C𰂀 𰁡𰀁𰅴𰀥𰂆SM

An essay on how the current state of technology enables a new quality of fascism by writer and sociotechnologist Jürgen Geuter aka @tante, commissioned within the call for projects Error 406 [Tech Fascism] Not Acceptable.

More
Published: 14 May 2025

𰅁𰂄 𰄡𰀀𰄲!

An essay by writer and cultural theorist Ana Teixeira Pinto on "Aggrieved Masculinity, Silicon Valley and the New Far Right", commissioned within the call for projects Error 406 [Tech Fascism] Not Acceptable.

𰅁𰂄 𰄡𰀀𰄲!

An essay on Aggrieved Masculinity, Silicon Valley and the New Far Right by writer and cultural theorist Ana Teixeira Pinto, commissioned within the call for projects Error 406 [Tech Fascism] Not Acceptable.

More

T𰁆𰀡𰁶 F𰀁𰅴𰀩IS𰄢
NOT ACCEPTABLE

T𰁆𰀡𰁶 F𰀁𰅴𰀩IS𰄢<br>NOT ACCEPTABLE

We are looking for 10 scores against tech fascism. Artists, curators, and collectives worldwide are invited to apply with project ideas that must be realized as a set of instructions, scores, how-tos, or interventions, and will be featured in an online exhibition organized by Error 417 Expectation Failed.

More

𰅵𰁅L𰁉𰀡𰆅𰁒D 𰅖𰅱𰅂𰂙E𰀩𰆆S

We received an overwhelming number of 430 submissions from around the world, and are happy to announce the selection of 13 projects by artists and collectives based in Austria, Brazil, France, Georgia, Germany, Mexico, Rojava, Turkey, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. These projects, selected by our jury Hito Steyerl, Nora O’Murchú, and Sam Lavigne, will receive a total of €50,866 in support and will be featured in an online exhibition in winter 2025/26.

View the Selected Projects

𰄴𰄣L𰂆N𰁅 𰁉𰈒𰂄I𰀖𰂐𰆆𰂆𰅆N
13 Scores Against Tech Fascism

13 Scores Against Tech Fascism is an online group exhibition that presents 13 projects selected through the open call Error 406 Tech Fascism Not Acceptable, initiated by Error 417 Expectation Failed in 2025.

13 Scores Against Tech Fascism: Exhibition website

The 13 Scores Against Tech Fascism are situated in very specific contexts; they range from interview protocols exposing the absurd principles guiding tech company leadership, to speculative blueprints of a DIY rocket for disrupting the White House’s Wi-Fi; from a step-by-step guide for turning tennis balls into protest devices to instructions for spamming the ICE hotline or even for using Trojan-horse tactics such as placing left-theory texts inside Jordan Peterson book covers in public libraries. More community-focussed project scores include instructions for producing and distributing mesh devices and building alternative collective tech infrastructures; from open calls for joyful dance events to transforming recipes used to mask censorship into forms of community activation. Some projects show us easy tricks on how to make our texts too dirty to train large language models, while others build poetic tools for Taiwanese speakers to hide meaning from state sanctioned speech.

Understood this way, the scores operate as frameworks for action. They address intimate, everyday shifts or propose strategies meant to be shared, repeated, and adapted by others. Rather than demanding compliance, these instructions invite participation, interpretation, and refusal.

In collaboration with Kunstsurfer, the online exhibition 13 Scores Against Tech Fascism runs on a browser add-on that recognises advertisements and replaces them with artworks. Download the add-on here.

visit the online exhibition  
download the exhibition add-on  

Antifascism: Now. x 13 Scores Against Tech Fascism

The online exhibition 13 Scores Against Tech Fascism is part of the group show 'Antifascism: Now.', a project dedicated to contemporary antifascist cultural practice, at Lothringer 13 in Munich from 30 January until 31 July 2026. In addition to showing the online exhibition on a screen, all 13 project scores are featured as wall texts throughout the exhibition space.
Error 417 Expectation Failed was also invited to contribute to the opening symposium of the exhibition with the panel discussion Error 406 Not Acceptable — Scores Against Tech Fascism' on Sunday, 1 February 2026.

View more impressions

𰅅P𰁐N 𰀠A𰄑L

Tech Fascism Not Acceptable

From surveillance systems and algorithmic decision-making to the emerging influence of AI, authoritarian technologies are not just tools — they are systems of control, exclusion, and manipulation that are deeply embedded in the very systems we interact with daily.

We must therefore ask: How does tech fascism affect us? How can we refuse, intervene in, or sabotage fascist systems? How can practices of civil disobedience be shared and brought to the mainstream? What role can art play in these acts of resistance?

Artists, curators, and collectives worldwide were invited to apply with project ideas, instructions, how-tos, interventions and practices that engage with the contemporary condition.

Read the Call for Projects

Jury & Selection Criteria

Read more about the selection criteria and the jury consisting of Hito Steyerl, Nora O’Murchú, and Sam Lavigne.

Selection Critera
The Jury

𰁉𰅵𰅶A𰈔𰅹

To contextualize the call's topic, the foundation commissioned two essays by cultural and media theorists Ana Teixeira Pinto and tante.

Essay: «Oh Man!» by Ana Teixera Pinto
Essay: «Refusing Tech Fascism» by tante

Linked collaborators

  • 868labs
  • NotToday
  • David Huerta
  • kunsf.xyz
  • Annika Santhanam
  • Alexey Boriskin
  • gabe nascimento
  • Enkaryon Ang
  • Rojava Center for Democratic Technologies
  • Jiawen Uffline
  • Permacomputing.net
  • Signals Rising
  • El Proyecto Sonidero
  • Hito Steyrl
  • Sam Lavigne
  • Nora O'Murchu

selection criteria ERROR 406
T𰁆𰀡𰁶 F𰀁𰅴𰀩IS𰄢 not acceptable

Relevance to the Theme: Refusing Tech Fascism

The projects should clearly engage with the concept of tech fascism — surveillance, algorithmic control, data extraction, platform power, etc. The jury is asked to look for critical insight and personal or political urgency tied to this theme.

Score

The applicant should demonstrate an understanding of the realization of the projects as a score, how to, or instruction. It should be made clear that the project opens up spaces for action (these can be metaphorical and narrative as well, for example).

Conceptual Clarity and Depth

We welcomed clear, well-thought-out concepts that not only relate to the theme but offer a strong critical, artistic, speculative and/or interventionist approach to confronting, resisting, or reimagining it. We also welcomed artistic work on infrastructural projects.

Urgency

The jury was asked to prioritize projects that respond to contemporary socio-technical developments or personal / political urgencies – projects that are contextually responsive and culturally relevant should be favoured.

Feasibility & Process

The proposed working process should be reflective of the conceptual aims. The foundation was open to supporting open-ended projects that may not be completed by the time of the online exhibition (end of 2025). Still, we were looking for projects that make sense to show publicly at that point.

Risk Taking and Failure

The foundation welcomed high risk, process-oriented projects that embrace a certain potential to fail by exploring non-preconceived paths. Bonus points were awarded to projects that specifically engage with the theme of failure and are able to reflect on it with humour.

Adaptability to an Online Exhibition Format

Can the work exist meaningfully online? The artists will be asked to deliver a) a score, and b) a realization of the score within the artists’ practice that can be exhibited online in a suitable format.

Additional Information: CV & Portfolio

The foundation favoured a diverse and broad representation of artistic positions, taking into account the artists’ practices and their experience / career. The jury could to take CVs and additional information into consideration. CV and portfolio were intended to provide additional context to the submissions, but should not be treated as main criterion for the selection.

Scope of the Grant

The funding requested by a specific project should correspond to its assumed complexity.

𰆆𰂃𰁈 J𰆑R𰈘

𰁸IT𰅁 ST𰁗Y𰁒RL

Hito Steyrl

Hito Steyerl is a filmmaker and writer based in Berlin. Her work addresses media, technology, and the global circulation of images through video installations, digital environments, and writing. She is Professor for Emergent Digital Media at Munich Art Academy. Her research platform at AdbK Munich, run with Francis Hunger, is at www.carrier-bag.net. She is represented by Esther Schipper (Berlin) and Andrew Kreps Gallery (New York).

𰄲𰅆𰅧𰀀 O' 𰄡U𰅨𰀩H𰆓

Nora O'Murchu

Nora O’ Murchú is a curator and researcher whose work explores how digital infrastructures—software, algorithms, and networks—reshape contemporary culture and politics. Drawing on queer-feminist and postcapitalist theory, her projects examine how technology can reinforce extractivist and authoritarian systems, while also revealing cracks for collective action and dissent.

She has curated exhibitions, residencies, and public programmes at Akademie Schloss Solitude, LABoral, and the Seoul Museum of Art, and served as Artistic Director of transmediale—Europe’s leading festival for art and digital culture—from 2020 to 2024. Her practice questions the boundaries between art and technology, asking how we might reclaim space for agency and collaboration amid the accelerating reconfigurations of techno-social life and the illusions of techno-solutionism. She currently serves as a Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Information Systems at the University of Limerick in Ireland.

noraomurchu.com 

𰅶𰀅𰄡 𰄖A𰈂𰂇G𰄣E

Sam Lavigne

Sam Lavigne is an artist and educator whose work deals with data, surveillance, cops, natural language processing, and automation. He is a Creative Capital grantee, recipient of the Pioneer Works Working Artist Fellowship, and the Brown Institute’s Magic Grant. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Synthetic Media and Algorithmic Justice at the Parsons School of Design.

lav.io 
Spinning footer logo on scroll
Error 417
𰁁􀅾𰅙𰁔C𰆈ATI𰅉N F𰀈𰂐𰄘𰁐D